The protections the EU provides the UK won’t vanish overnight if we leave. But when you consider the progress the EU has made, and continues to make, in protecting our welfare, income, and health, it seems ludicrous to leave. Here are just five ways the EU protects member state citizens:

1. Ensures goods and services are priced fairly

Greater ability for competition between companies selling goods across Europe has made the things you buy cheaper. Wine is a great example. Thanks to the European Court of Justice Case 170/78 excise duty on wine has been cut, making wine comparatively cheaper to buy in the supermarket in the last 30 years. This ruling has helped British ale producers too, with excise duties on British beer trade to the continent being cut thanks to the ruling, making British beer more competitive across the continent. There are many more examples of how our membership of the EU is bringing down living costs. Another one is air travel, which is now up to 40% cheaper thanks to a 1992 EU ruling.

2. Prevents workplace discrimination

As recently as 1990, the European Union’s Equal Treatment Directive of 1976 was successfully used to end discriminatory practices against British women in the workplace based upon her gender. British Gas plc was forcing women to retire from the company at the age of 60 – 5 years younger than their male colleagues had to retire. The British government failed to stop this discrimination from happening at one of its own state-controlled companies, so several employees took it up with to the European Court of Justice on the basis that it broke the European Union’s Equal Treatment Directive. The court ruled in their favour.

This was not an isolated event: the case of Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority can is a further example. Most of the discrimination this EU directive prevents goes unrecorded as not all anti-discrimination cases get all the way to the European Court of Justice before they are settled in domestic courts. But when our national government fails to prevent discrimination, the EU is able to step in to protect ordinary citizens.

3. Protects your health at home and abroad

A huge amount of legislation has been enacted by the EU to protect your health both within the UK and when travelling across the continent. One of the lesser known rulings of the EU is that of the European Blood Safety Directives (known as cases 2002/98/EC and 2004/33/EC). These set the standards for quality and safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of blood in the UK and across the EU. Should you require something as simple as a blood test or even a transfusion in the UK or when travelling in EU you can be safe in the knowledge that it will be performed safely and cleanly. Prior to the EU every country had their own safety standard, meaning you could never be sure if foreign healthcare was as good as the healthcare you got back home.

4. Cleans up the environment

The EU Bathing Water Directive of 1991 regulates bathing water quality and safety on British beaches. When you visit the Margate Sands or Watergate Bay you can now be sure the bathing water is safe. Between 1990 and 2008 bathing water quality problems have become far less common in the United Kingdom: 95.5% of coastal bathing areas met the mandatory requirements in 2008 – an 18.4% percentage increase from before. This has not been exclusive to the UK either; the Bathing Water Directive has made bathing waters across Europe cleaner and safer, making it easier and safer to holiday across Europe.

5. Makes the UK a science superpower

The UK received more money back as science and research grants from the EU than it pays into the EU’s science budget. One example of where this funding goes is the work of Professor Xavier Salvatella, which has received funding from the European Research Council to research a longer-lasting treatment for those suffering from prostate cancer, which kills approximately 70,000 European men a year. One day Salvatella’s research could save thousands of these lives a year. Funding for scientific innovations like this in the UK would be put in serious jeopardy should we leave the EU and the UK government does not replace the funds.


Given that in the past the UK government has shown these issues are not always a priority, surely staying in the EU is the best way for us to preserve and enhance these protections for ourselves and for future generations?



Foster vs British Gas plc

Marshall vs
Griffin vs South West Water
ECJ Case 170/78
Air Travel Liberalisation
Blood Safety Directive 2002/98/EC
Blood Safety Directive 2004/33/EC
Bathing Water Directive
Professor Xavier Salvatella’s research